Well, I DO
have a problem Mr. President!
We have a
Bill of Rights. Some of those rights, may seem to protect “guilty” people. That
is to say, WHY would anyone need to protect themselves from speaking against
themselves, if they didn’t do anything wrong; or, be protected from unlawful
searches and seizures, if you’ve nothing to hide; or, own firearms, if the
government can protect you from any “enemies, foreign and domestic”?
The Bill of
Rights, aren’t there to protect “guilty” people. The Bill of Rights, are there
to protect ALL people, against a powerful government doing whatever they
wanted. The Bill of Rights are there to
protect us from a government that could use such powers to for all kinds of
nefarious reasons.
Obama
mentioned the trust of “federal judges”. What IF, like in the case of US
Attorney General Eric Holder, law enforcement went judge shopping for a judge that
would allow them to do most anything they wanted. After all, they’re Cops,
right? In the case of the Department of Justice, they went to three judges,
before they found one that would rubber-stamp a really pathetic warrant to search
the records of a reporter’s phone and emails, as well as those of his parents!
Second to
that example, what IF the government, through the massive power to get
information from personal files, phones, emails, etc., found something very
embarrassing against a federal judge or other official? Could THAT be used to
sway someone to go along with things he or she wouldn’t otherwise do? So
there’s my take on federal judges, and unbridled trust.
Trust
Congress? I don’t think so. They are elected to “represent” us. But how many
times have we seen an elected official do things in their own best interest?
How many find themselves getting very rich, while “serving the people”? And WHO
in their right mind, would dare trust an attorney who would recommend a client sign an unread
contract, yet that is exactly what they did on our behalf, with the Obamacare
crap! (and how many more unread bills?) An attorney would be fired, if not brought up before the Bar for malpractice!
And then
there’s Obama. There is NO WAY in hell I trust him. He lied about the
circumstances around the failed DOJ/ATF Fast and Furious gun running operation,
where a couple thousand guns went across to Mexico, and they lost track of them. Then to have at least two show up at a murder scene, where Border Agent Brian
Terry was killed! Obama said he wasn’t involved in that, but ended up saving
Eric Holder’s ass with an “Executive Privedge” order, which if there was no
involvement by Obama, then there shouldn’t have been any communication between
him and Holder for an EP to apply! He abused his power and authority, and/or HE LIED!
He LIED
about the cause of the attack on our Embassy in Benghazi, and what lead to the
deaths of four of our people. He had a
re-election coming up, and he lied to protect his imagine. He’s a lying
bastard in my opinion!
As for the 2nd
amendment - It isn’t about hunting. It’s about protection, and that protection
includes protection from a tyrannical government, which is what our Founding
Fathers experienced with King George. It was added because King George, in
order to avert the growing dissention, tried to take the weapons from “the
people”. Our Founders included, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,
shall not be infringed”, just because of the actions the British army tried to
take against the Colonials. No sir, I
will NOT surrender my arms. I firmly believe that a government that would disregard
our other “rights” (currently, the 4th amendment), is more than capable of being the tyrannical government our
Founders warned against, and try to disarm us of our means to stop an out-of-control government.
Lastly, the
Bill of Rights are in place to protect all of us from such a government that
would stretch any law they choose, to get the end result they may want, even if
they felt that result was in the best interest of the country. We should NEVER
blindly trust this, or any, government. “Rights” given up, may be impossible to
regain.
As Lord Acton said in 1887, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”