The Fallacy of Compromise

In today's political climate, one thing seems to be causing gridlock, preventing some actions to move forward. The lack of compromise, is seen more and more often. In some ways, I see this as two sides, remaining stubborn to hang on to political power for their sides. Compromise, may be seen as a weakness to stand ones political ground, or as a political weapon to make the other side look bad.

Our political system can only work when a consensus is achieved to get the nations business done. But, that also requires that both sides are trying to achieve the same general goal, but differing ways to get there.

But there may be a hitch in this, and I feel it applies in DC today - The Constitution.

IF, and argue as you choose on this, there is a choice on the floor between the Constitutional and some Socialist type proposal. A "compromise", would suggest those supporting the Constitution, should give in a little to some socialist (or UN-constitutional) ideas. ..... I will tell you here and now, I would NEVER "compromise" when it comes to our Constitution. To do so, in favor of what I would feel as a creeping in of some other form of government or governing, would not be on the table for negotiation. NEVER.

IF, and it is yet to be decided, the healthcare reform act IS found to be un-constitutional, and assuming many on the right always felt it was, then an unwavering position to oppose the only bill offered up, would likely be seen by the right as the right thing to do. In an "all or nothing" proposal that is believed to be constitutionally wrong, no one should go along with it just to show they can get along and be "compromising".

While all this can be argued as to what is steadfastly "constitutional" or not, there is another way I look at the sometimes problem with "compromise".

IF you went to the doctor for an localized infected ingrown toenail, and the doctor told you that you would have to have your leg removed, would you be willing to "compromise" by only having just your foot removed? Wouldn't you object to such an extreme measure, and ask the doctor why the he/she couldn't just fix the toe? But the doctor insists the measures offered were the only ones he/she was willing to do. You protest that evaluation and protest firmly against those two options. The doctor then tells your family that you are being impossible, because you won't compromise. Then even your family begins to think you are being a bit unreasonable.

A "compromise", between two bad choices without consideration of a third option, is NOT a valid compromise. And THAT is where I stand, as well as others, like Tea Party supporters, and will NOT compromise on issues I see as "constitutionally" wrong. If that is being a "right wing extremist", then sign me up!